Research on the Average Penis Size
Among all mammals, only man seems to have concern for the size of his penis. The fact that the average penis size for men is remarkably larger, longer and denser than the average size of the penis of other primates, including large primates such as gorillas, it must be pretty good for men. But no, it is obviously not the case. There are no official figures for the average size of the penis. Therefore, the course will vary from source to source, depending on which you asked. Researchers have undertaken numerous studies which attempt to determine the average size of penis of men. Their results provide some insight on how you measure up. In September 1996, the Journal of Urology published a study that pegged the average size of the penis (length) at 12.9 cm or 5.0 inches.
In December 2000, the international journal of impotence research came out with its own study put the average penis size (length) when it is raised in 5.35 cm or 13.6 inches. Meanwhile, in the form of condoms led his own life during the 2001 spring break from college students to be fun in Cancun, Mexico and the results revealed an average size penis when erect was 14.9 cm or 5.9 inches .
Two other surveys on penis size were recently conducted online and results are totally different from the rest: a pegged the average size of the penis in 16 cm or 6.4 inch size while the other half of the penis when it is pegged at 15.6 cm tall or 6.1 inches. The study of the condom of life forms also measured the average size of the penis (girth) when upright and found an average of 12.6 cm or 5.0 inches.
To flaccid length, Journal of Urology put the average penis size 8.8 cm or 3.5 inches. Several studies stress that the length of a flaccid penis is not proportional to its length when erect. Some studies cite cases where a flaccid penis below average would be five times its length and twice its girth when erect. Meanwhile, a flaccid penis above average growth was only 1.5 times when it is erect. A word of caution here: many of these studies could be unreliable depending on how the examination was conducted. For example, if there was “bias” of the self; involved, so it means that men choose to or could not be measured or the results would probably be in negative polarization.
The probability is that men who felt they had small penises are reluctant to measure them while those with larger penises are more likely to measure. There are no studies that have considered this self-bias. Moreover, those studies that require a same-size information penis (online surveys, for example) will probably spoiled the results given the inclination of men to exaggerate their penis size or penis measuring incorrectly. For example, two studies online in the average size of the penis reported above measures significantly higher than other studies.
Tags: 
